From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Dep't of Corr.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 21, 2017
225 So. 3d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D17–0626

08-21-2017

Gene RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Gene Ramirez, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lateasha L. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Gene Ramirez, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lateasha L. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent's motion for clarification filed on May 3, 2017, is treated as a motion to dismiss and is granted. This proceeding is treated as a premature appeal and is dismissed. See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) ; Baldwin v. Crosby, 905 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (concluding "proper remedy is to file a motion in the circuit court seeking [removal of lien and restoration of funds collected], secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought of any final order in the proceedings below").

WINOKUR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Dep't of Corr.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 21, 2017
225 So. 3d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Gene RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 21, 2017

Citations

225 So. 3d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)