From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Dennison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 2007
39 A.D.3d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 746N.

April 12, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered on or about July 7, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied respondent's motion to change venue to either Orange or Albany County, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted insofar as to transfer the proceeding to Albany County.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York (Laura R. Johnson of counsel), for appellant.

Santiago Ramirez, respondent pro se.

Before: Tom, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.


In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner challenges the denial of his parole application. Accordingly, pursuant to CPLR 506 (b), venue should have been placed in the judicial district where the complained-of parole determination was rendered, or where respondent's principal office is located ( see Matter of Howard v New York State Bd. of Parole, 5 AD3d 271 [2004]). Inasmuch as the challenged determination was affirmed on administrative appeal in Albany County, where respondent has his principal office, Albany County, and not the Bronx, is a proper venue for the proceeding, and we grant respondent's motion to the extent of transferring the proceeding to Albany County.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Dennison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 2007
39 A.D.3d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Dennison

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SANTIAGO RAMIREZ, Respondent, v. ROBERT DENNISON, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 12, 2007

Citations

39 A.D.3d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
834 N.Y.S.2d 120

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Dennison

The instant appeal is moot and must be dismissed, since petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole…

Phillips v. Dennison

Finally, we note that the Board correctly asserts that venue for a proceeding such as this is properly…