From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raji v. Nejad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1998
256 A.D.2d 12 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 1, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.).


The causes of action under Civil Rights Law § 80-b to recover gifts in contemplation of a marriage that did not occur were properly dismissed on the ground that plaintiff was married at the time the gifts were made, and it does not avail plaintiff that his divorce action was pending at the time ( Lowe v. Quinn, 27 N.Y.2d 397).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Raji v. Nejad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1998
256 A.D.2d 12 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Raji v. Nejad

Case Details

Full title:SAYED M. RAJI, Appellant, v. LILI F. NEJAD, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 12 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 520

Citing Cases

Listokin v. Kreitman

However, when, as here, one of the parties is married, the courts have held that an engagement ring or other…

Lipschutz v. Kiderman

Although the plaintiff in Lowe argued that Civil Rights Law § 80-b should be interpreted to permit the…