From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rajgopaul v. Toys “R” Us, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 24, 2002
297 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-10543

Argued September 5, 2002.

September 24, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated September 5, 2001, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Barry Seidel, Forest Hills, N.Y. (Susan R. Nudelman of counsel), for appellants.

McAndrew, Conboy Prisco, Woodbury, N.Y. (Robert M. Ortiz and Mary C. Villeck of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, STEPHEN G. CRANE, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint by showing that it neither created an unsafe condition nor had actual or constructive notice thereof (see Pianforini v. Kelties Bum Steer, 258 A.D.2d 634; Marcelle v. New York City Transit Authority, 289 A.D.2d 459). In response, the plaintiffs submitted no proof, only speculation, as to what actually may have caused the fall (see Pianforini v. Kelties Bum Steer, supra). The conclusory affidavits supplied by the plaintiffs contradicted prior deposition testimony and do not constitute the sort of evidence needed to defeat a motion for summary judgment (see Humphreys v. Veneziano, 268 A.D.2d 461; see also Marcelle v. New York City Transit Authority, supra).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rajgopaul v. Toys “R” Us, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 24, 2002
297 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Rajgopaul v. Toys “R” Us, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BIBI RAJGOPAUL, ET AL., appellants, v. TOYS R US, INC., ETC., respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 24, 2002

Citations

297 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
747 N.Y.S.2d 792

Citing Cases

Blanco v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

The determinative factor in premises liability cases is control (see, Siegel v. Hofstra University, 154 AD2d…

Kandylis v. Ditmars 31st St. Assoc., LLC

To constitute constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent and exist for a sufficient period of…