From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Railroad Federal Sav. and Loan v. Rosemont Holding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1936
248 App. Div. 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

October 23, 1936.


Order denying motion to vacate a final judgment of foreclosure and sale affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The Supreme Court of the State of New York is a court of general jurisdiction (State Const. art. 6, § 1), and its jurisdiction in law and equity extends to the whole State. Section 183 of the Civil Practice Act does not affect the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, but determines only the county of trial. ( Cragin v. Lovell, 88 N.Y. 258, 263.) If the defendant does not avail himself of the provisions of the Civil Practice Act to have the cause moved to the proper county for trial, a judgment in an action affecting real property brought in a county other than that designated as the proper county is valid. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Railroad Federal Sav. and Loan v. Rosemont Holding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1936
248 App. Div. 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Railroad Federal Sav. and Loan v. Rosemont Holding

Case Details

Full title:RAILROAD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. ROSEMONT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Clark v. Clark

CPLR § 507 provides that "(t)he place of trial of an action in which the judgment demanded would affect the…