From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raikoglo v. U.S. Gov't

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 5, 2024
3:24-cv-5494-JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 5, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-5494-JLR

07-05-2024

LANCE RAIKOGLO, Plaintiff, v. U.S. GOVERNMENT, et al., Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Theresa L. Fricke United States Magistrate Judge

Because plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $405.00 filing fee, plaintiff financially qualifies for in forma pauperis (IFP) status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore. Plaintiff's IFP application is GRANTED. However, based on the allegations in the complaint, it does not appear plaintiff has adequately stated a claim. Therefore, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).


Summaries of

Raikoglo v. U.S. Gov't

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 5, 2024
3:24-cv-5494-JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Raikoglo v. U.S. Gov't

Case Details

Full title:LANCE RAIKOGLO, Plaintiff, v. U.S. GOVERNMENT, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 5, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-5494-JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 5, 2024)