From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raifman v. Wachovia Sec., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
Case No. C 11-02885 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. C 11-02885 SBA

03-18-2013

GREGORY R. RAIFMAN and SUSAN RAIFMAN, husband and wife, individually and on behalf of their marital community and as Trustees of the RAIFMAN FAMILY REVOCABLE INTERVIVOS TRUST and as beneficiaries of the PALLADIAN TRUST; GEKKO HOLDINGS, LLC, and HELICON INVESTMENTS, LTD., Plaintiffs, v. WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, N/K/A WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC; Defendant.

RONALD E. WOOD, SBN 133854 JENNIFER L. ROCHE, SBN 254538 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Attorneys for Defendant Wachovia Securities, LLC n/k/a Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC Tod Aronovitz (Pro Hac Vice ) Barbara Perez (Pro Hac Vice ) Andrew Zelmanowitz (Pro Hac Vice ) ARONOVITZ LAW By: Tod Aronovitz Attorneys for Plaintiffs


RONALD E. WOOD, SBN 133854
JENNIFER L. ROCHE, SBN 254538
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Wachovia Securities, LLC
n/k/a Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC

STIPULATION WITHDRAWING

OPPOSITION AND CONSENTING TO

FILING OF PLAINTIFFS' PROPOSED

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT


Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong

WHEREAS, on March 11, 2013, the Court denied Defendant's motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint on procedural grounds;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave To File Proposed Second Amended Complaint ("Motion for Leave"), is scheduled for hearing on March 19, 2013; and

WHEREAS, on March 15, 2013, counsel for Defendant advised counsel for Plaintiffs of Defendant's intent to withdraw its opposition to Plaintiffs' pending motion and consent to Plaintiffs' filing the proposed Second Amended Complaint.

NOW THERFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that:

1. Defendant hereby withdraws its opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To File Proposed Second Amended Complaint;

2. Defendant consents to Plaintiffs' filing the [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, previously filed as Docket No. 105-1, reserving its right to file any appropriate motion directed against it, including a motion to dismiss; and

3. Defendant's time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is hereby adjourned sin die.

RONALD E. WOOD

JENNIFER L. ROCHE

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

By: _________________

Ronald E. Wood

Attorneys for Defendant

Tod Aronovitz (Pro Hac Vice)

Barbara Perez (Pro Hac Vice)

Andrew Zelmanowitz (Pro Hac Vice)

ARONOVITZ LAW

By: Tod Aronovitz

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Raifman v. Wachovia Sec., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
Case No. C 11-02885 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Raifman v. Wachovia Sec., LLC

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY R. RAIFMAN and SUSAN RAIFMAN, husband and wife, individually and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

Case No. C 11-02885 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)