From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raia v. Pototschnig

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 2, 2017
148 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-02-2017

Joseph RAIA, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Hubert POTOTSCHNIG, Defendant–Appellant, New Century Mortgage Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Hubert Pototschnig, Woodbury, appellant pro se. Jeffrey I. Baum & Associates, P.C., Garden City (Jeffrey I. Baum of counsel), for respondent.


Hubert Pototschnig, Woodbury, appellant pro se.

Jeffrey I. Baum & Associates, P.C., Garden City (Jeffrey I. Baum of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered January 5, 2016, which denied the motion of defendant Hubert Pototschnig to reject the report of the referee, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly denied defendant's motion, rejecting his attempts to relitigate issues already adjudicated in this action (see Domingez v. Zinnar, 130 A.D.3d 414, 11 N.Y.S.3d 484 [1st Dept.2015] ).

Defendant also failed to offer a proposed calculation of interest in response to the court's several requests for him to do so, and the court otherwise afforded defendant ample opportunities to be heard on his objections to the referee's report.

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., ANDRIAS, FEINMAN, KAPNICK, GESMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Raia v. Pototschnig

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 2, 2017
148 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Raia v. Pototschnig

Case Details

Full title:Joseph RAIA, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Hubert POTOTSCHNIG…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 2, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 1642
47 N.Y.S.3d 711