From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rafa Enterprises, Inc. v. Pigand Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1992
184 A.D.2d 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 16, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Francis N. Pecora, J.).


Plaintiff's moving papers were deficient, having failed to set forth an affidavit of service by mail upon the last known address of the corporation, as required pursuant to CPLR 3215 (f) (4) (i). While this issue appears to be raised for the first time on appeal, it pertains to the statutory requirements for obtaining a default judgment, and the omission is apparent upon the face of the record and could not have been avoided if raised at the proper juncture. Accordingly, appellate review of the matter is appropriate (see, Matter of Knickerbocker Field Club v. Site Selection Bd., 41 A.D.2d 539, 540). The letter annexed to plaintiff's reply affidavit indicating a mailing to defendant's insurance carrier does not comply with this provision.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Rafa Enterprises, Inc. v. Pigand Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1992
184 A.D.2d 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Rafa Enterprises, Inc. v. Pigand Management Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RAFA ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. PIGAND MANAGEMENT CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Whosoever Will Cmty. Church of Christ v. Beebe

" The rule is that "[a] default judgment may not be granted against a non-appearing corporate defendant…

Ventura v. 560 W. 180th St., NYC LLC

The rule is that "[a] default judgment may not be granted against a non-appearing corporate defendant without…