From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radford v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Jun 10, 2009
No. 5:08-CV-421-FL (E.D.N.C. Jun. 10, 2009)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding that the claimant's ability to perform certain tasks was not inconsistent with mild mental retardation

Summary of this case from Gilliard v. Berryhill
See 9 Summaries

Opinion

No. 5:08-CV-421-FL.

June 10, 2009

ORDER

LOUISE FLANAGAN, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M R") of United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling.

The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jones as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintiffs motion is GRANTED, defendant's motion is DENIED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the M R. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.

Summaries of

Radford v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Jun 10, 2009
No. 5:08-CV-421-FL (E.D.N.C. Jun. 10, 2009)

finding that the claimant's ability to perform certain tasks was not inconsistent with mild mental retardation

Summary of this case from Gilliard v. Berryhill

finding that the claimant's ability to perform certain tasks was not inconsistent with a mild intellectual disability

Summary of this case from Owens v. Berryhill

finding that the claimant's ability to perform certain tasks was not inconsistent with mild mental retardation

Summary of this case from Tyre v. Colvin

finding that the claimant's ability to perform certain tasks was not inconsistent with mild mental retardation

Summary of this case from Smith v. Colvin

finding that the claimant's ability to perform certain tasks was not inconsistent with mild mental retardation

Summary of this case from Nichols v. Colvin

finding that the claimant's ability to perform certain tasks was not inconsistent with mild mental retardation

Summary of this case from Garner v. Colvin

finding that the claimant's ability to perform certain tasks was not inconsistent with mild mental retardation

Summary of this case from Richardson v. Colvin

finding that the claimant's ability to perform certain tasks was not inconsistent with mild mental retardation

Summary of this case from Lavender v. Colvin

adopting magistrate judge recommendation finding that an individual's ability "to work, complete household chores, and raise a family is not inconsistent with mild mental retardation"

Summary of this case from Sechrist v. Colvin
Case details for

Radford v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH RADFORD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division

Date published: Jun 10, 2009

Citations

No. 5:08-CV-421-FL (E.D.N.C. Jun. 10, 2009)

Citing Cases

Weeks v. Colvin

Second, Weeks challenges the ALJ's emphasis on Weeks's history of living independently and raising children…

Tyre v. Colvin

ing 12.05C criteria are otherwise met, Luckey, 890 F.2d at 669, can be relevant in determining whether a…

15 Citing Cases