From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quinlan v. F. M. Schaefer Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1952
279 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

January 21, 1952.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order granting plaintiff's motion for a preference in the trial of the action reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied, without costs. There was no sufficient showing warranting the exercise of discretion in favor of granting the preference. (Cf. O'Callaghan v. Brawley, 276 App. Div. 908; Braver v. Davis, 277 App. Div. 879; Pitrello v. Garro, 278 App. Div. 770; Svei v. Minck Bros. Co., 279 App. Div. 597.) Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Quinlan v. F. M. Schaefer Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1952
279 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Quinlan v. F. M. Schaefer Brewing Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANNE QUINLAN, Respondent, v. F. M. SCHAEFER BREWING Co., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Sheehan v. Behr

Destitution and incapacity to work are insufficiently shown. ( Farewell v. Milbank, 284 App. Div. 898; Svei…

Mullally v. Cornish

There was insufficient showing of destitution, or probability of death before trial in the regular order, to…