From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Queensboro Farm Prod. v. General Acci. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 13, 1998

Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate), not a party to this action, commenced a declaratory judgment action against, among others, Queensboro Farm Products, Inc. (hereinafter Queensboro), General Accident Insurance Company (hereinafter General Accident), and Pennsylvania General Insurance Company. In that action Allstate sought, inter alia, a declaration that General Accident was obligated to defend and indemnify Queensboro in an underlying action entitled Okang v. Queensboro Farm Products, Inc., pending in the Supreme Court, Bronx County. Allstate moved for summary judgment on the issue of coverage and the motion was denied, largely due to the lack of evidentiary proof in support of the motion. Accordingly, because the motion was denied without the merits of the action having been determined, the doctrine of collateral estoppel does not serve to bar the instant litigation ( see, Ryan v. New York Tel. Co., 62 N.Y.2d 494, 500; Schwartz v. Public Adm'r of County of Bronx, 24 N.Y.2d 65).

Moreover, Queensboro is entitled to summary judgment in the instant case since it tendered sufficient evidence to demonstrate that coverage for the truck in question existed at the time of the accident and because the defendants have failed to establish that material issues of fact exist ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).

Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Queensboro Farm Prod. v. General Acci. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Queensboro Farm Prod. v. General Acci. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:QUEENSBORO FARM PRODUCTS, INC., Respondent, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 663

Citing Cases

Martinetti v. New Hartford Police Dept

We agree with plaintiffs that Supreme Court erred in granting that part of the Town's motion seeking summary…

Burke Physical Therapy, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Contrary to plaintiff's argument, the denial of defendant's motion for summary judgment in a declaratory…