From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Queen v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1912
76 S.E. 682 (N.C. 1912)

Opinion

(Filed 14 December, 1912.)

1. Appeal and Error — Appeal from Judgment — Assignment of Error — Motions.

An appeal from the judgment rendered is of itself an assignment of error, and the case on appeal will not on motion be dismissed on the ground that no error was therein assigned by appellant.

2. Appeal and Error — In Forma Pauperis — Leave to Appeal — Practice.

To appeal as pauper, the statutory leave must be obtained, and the mere leave to sue as a pauper is not sufficient.

3. Appeal and Error — Case — Settlement by Judge — Practice.

It is necessary that the trial judge settle the case on appeal when the parties do not agree.

APPEAL from Webb, J., at Special Term, 1912, of GRAHAM.

J. N. Moody, A. D. Raby, for plaintiff.

Dillard Hill, M. W. Bell, Morphew Phillips for defendant.


This is an appeal from a nonsuit. The defendant's motion to dismiss because there is no assignment of error cannot be allowed, because the appeal from the judgment is of itself an assignment of error. Wilson v. Lumber Co., 131 N.C. 163, and cases there cited; Mershon v. Morris, 148 N.C. 51.

But there is no case on appeal settled by the judge or by counsel. The evidence in the shape of question and answer is dumped into the record, and there is nothing to show that it is correct. Besides, while there is leave to sue as a pauper, there is no leave to appeal as a pauper, no appeal bond, and no printed record nor any printed brief on behalf of the plaintiff.

Appeal dismissed.

(218)


Summaries of

Queen v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1912
76 S.E. 682 (N.C. 1912)
Case details for

Queen v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:MARY QUEEN, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. SNOWBIRD VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1912

Citations

76 S.E. 682 (N.C. 1912)
161 N.C. 217

Citing Cases

Mershon v. Morris

Affirmed. Cited: Gordon Co. v. Morris, post 53; Mfg. Co. v. Buggy Co., 152 N.C. 635; Bank v. Oil Co., 157…

In re Edwards' Will

The caveator moved to dismiss the appeal for failure to assign error; but exception was taken at the time,…