From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Putnam v. Montgomery Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
Civil No. 3:12-0132 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:12-0132

01-15-2013

TIMOTHY PUTNAM and BENJAMIN MORROW, Plaintiffs, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, in its official capacity, and NORMAN LEWIS, Sheriff, in his official capacity, Defendants.


Judge Trauger

Magistrate Judge Griffin


ORDER

On December 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 62), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that all pending motions (Docket Nos. 33, 34, 47, 53, 57) are DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED in its entirety as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

______________________

ALETA A. TRAUGER

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Putnam v. Montgomery Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
Civil No. 3:12-0132 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Putnam v. Montgomery Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY PUTNAM and BENJAMIN MORROW, Plaintiffs, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

Civil No. 3:12-0132 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 15, 2013)

Citing Cases

Fisher v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Moreover, given the “unique complexities of the prison setting[,] [p]rison administrators must be entitled to…