From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Putnam Cnty. Prob. Dep't v. Dimichele

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 27, 2014
120 A.D.3d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-08-27

In the Matter of PUTNAM COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, respondent, v. Frederick J. DIMICHELE, appellant.


Michael G. Paul, New City, N.Y., for appellant.

In related child support proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Putnam County (Reitz, J.), dated August 20, 2013, which, without a hearing, in effect, revoked an order of the same court dated October 11, 2007, suspending his commitment and placing him on probation, and directed that he be incarcerated.

ORDERED that the order dated August 20, 2013, is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Putnam County, for a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 433.

At the outset, due to the enduring consequences which may potentially flow from the revocation of the order suspending the father's commitment, the fact that the father has been released from prison due to the expiration of his commitment does not render the instant appeal academic ( see generally Matter of Biondo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 N.Y.2d 832, 834, 470 N.Y.S.2d 130, 458 N.E.2d 371; Matter of Peck v. Evans, 118 A.D.3d 1086, 990 N.Y.S.2d 272).

Turning to the merits, while the Family Court had the discretion to revoke the suspension of the jail sentence it had previously imposed upon finding that the father had willfully failed to obey a lawful order of support ( see Family Ct. Act § 454[3][a] ), the court erred in doing so without first affording the father a hearing ( seeFamily Ct. Act § 433[a]; see also Matter of Davis v. Bond, 104 A.D.3d 1227, 960 N.Y.S.2d 806; Matter of Conlon v. Kortz, 86 A.D.3d 670, 926 N.Y.S.2d 723; Matter of Horike v. Freedman, 81 A.D.3d 1091, 916 N.Y.S.2d 530; Matter of Thompson v. Thompson, 59 A.D.3d 1104, 873 N.Y.S.2d 786; Matter of DeVries v. DeVries, 59 A.D.3d 619, 620, 875 N.Y.S.2d 488).

Accordingly, we reverse the order and remit the matter to the Family Court, Putnam County, for a hearing on the petition pursuant to Family Court Act § 433. SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, COHEN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Putnam Cnty. Prob. Dep't v. Dimichele

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 27, 2014
120 A.D.3d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Putnam Cnty. Prob. Dep't v. Dimichele

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PUTNAM COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 27, 2014

Citations

120 A.D.3d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
120 A.D.3d 820
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 5988

Citing Cases

Zhuo Hong Zheng v. Hsin Cheng

The order of commitment committed the father to the custody of the New York City Department of Correction for…

Shoga v. Annucci

We nevertheless review the merits of the amended petition in the interest of judicial economy (see Matter of…