From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puricelli v. Arns Invs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 4, 2015
No. 3:14-CV-4018-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 4, 2015)

Opinion

No. 3:14-CV-4018-M-BN

02-04-2015

WALTER PURICELLI, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. ARNS INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case on January 13, 2015. See Dkt. No. 9. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 4th day of February, 2015.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Puricelli v. Arns Invs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 4, 2015
No. 3:14-CV-4018-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Puricelli v. Arns Invs., LLC

Case Details

Full title:WALTER PURICELLI, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. ARNS INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 4, 2015

Citations

No. 3:14-CV-4018-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 4, 2015)

Citing Cases

SAI Hotel Grp. Ltd. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

However, the "fair notice" standard of Rule 47 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure remains in effect.…

Polansky's Wrecker Serv. v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.

However, the "fair notice" standard of Rule 47 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure remains in effect.…