From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Punches v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Jun 30, 1976
243 N.W.2d 518 (Wis. 1976)

Opinion

No. 645 (1974).

Argued February 2, 1976. —

Decided June 30, 1976.

APPEAL from a judgment and order of the county court of St. Croix county: JOSEPH W. HUGHES, Judge. Affirmed.

For the appellants there were briefs by Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, Charles R. Larsen and James H. McDermott, assistant attorneys general, and oral argument by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general.

For the respondent there was a brief by Doar, Drill, Norman Bakke of New Richmond, and oral argument by Thomas D. Bell.


The members of the court being equally divided on the question of whether the judgment and order should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice BEILFUSS, Mr. Justice HANLEY, and Mr. Justice ROBERT W. HANSEN being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Mr. Justice HEFFERNAN, Mr. Justice CONNOR T. HANSEN, and Mr. Justice DAY being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Punches v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Jun 30, 1976
243 N.W.2d 518 (Wis. 1976)
Case details for

Punches v. Schmidt

Case Details

Full title:PUNCHES, Respondent, v. SCHMIDT, and another, Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 30, 1976

Citations

243 N.W.2d 518 (Wis. 1976)
243 N.W.2d 518

Citing Cases

Smith v. Kleynerman

54. Brown v. State , 73 Wis.2d 351, 243 N.W.2d 519 (1976) (on appeal).55. Punches v. S chmid t , 73 Wis.2d…

News v. City of Richmond

¶ 19 The circumstances surrounding my arrival on the court in September 1976 are instructive.¶ 20 Chief…