From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puma Se v. Brooks Sports, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 26, 2024
2:24-cv-00940-JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 26, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00940-JLR

07-26-2024

PUMA SE and PUMA NORTH AMERICA INC., Plaintiffs, v. BROOKS SPORTS, INC., Defendant.

SUMMIT LAW GROUP, PLLC By: Hathaway Burden, WSBA #52970 Diana Siri Breaux, WSBA #46112 Attorneys for Defendant Brooks Sports, Inc. PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP By: Geoffrey Potter Aron R. Fischer Lachlan S. Campbell-Verduyn Collin Y. Hong


NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: July 26, 2024

SUMMIT LAW GROUP, PLLC By: Hathaway Burden, WSBA #52970 Diana Siri Breaux, WSBA #46112 Attorneys for Defendant Brooks Sports, Inc.

PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP By: Geoffrey Potter [*] Aron R. Fischer [*] Lachlan S. Campbell-Verduyn [*] Collin Y. Hong [*]

[PROPOSED] UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Honorable James L. Robart United States District Judge

Pursuant to Local Rule 7(j), Defendant Brooks Sports, Inc. hereby files this Unopposed Motion for Relief from the Deadline to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint, and to extend Defendant's deadline from July 29, 2024 to September 5, 2024 and as good cause states as follows:

1. On June 27, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint asserting nine counts against Defendant, involving nine separate patents and five accused products;

2. On July 8, 2024, Plaintiffs served Defendant;

3. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint is currently July 29, 2024;

4. Given the number of counts, patents, and accused products involved, Defendant respectfully requests an extension to September 5, 2024 to investigate and respond;

5. Plaintiffs do not oppose this Motion or the relief sought herein.

6. Such relief will not affect any other deadlines or prejudice either party.

For the foregoing reasons, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant its Motion for Relief from Deadlines.

DATED this 26th day of July, 2024.

I certify that this memorandum contains 153 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

This matter came before the Court upon the foregoing Motion, and the Court, being fully advised in the premises:

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Court grants Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Relief from Deadlines. Defendant's deadline to respond to the complaint is September 5, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of July, 2024.

[*]pro hac vice forthcoming


Summaries of

Puma Se v. Brooks Sports, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 26, 2024
2:24-cv-00940-JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Puma Se v. Brooks Sports, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PUMA SE and PUMA NORTH AMERICA INC., Plaintiffs, v. BROOKS SPORTS, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 26, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00940-JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 26, 2024)