From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pullins v. Palmero

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Apr 21, 2009
Case No. 3:08cv00118 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 21, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv00118.

April 21, 2009


DECISION AND ENTRY


The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #22), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 3, 2009 (Doc. #22) is ADOPTED in full;
2. Defendant's Motion To Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Doc. #15) is GRANTED;
3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, White Plains Division; and
4. This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.


Summaries of

Pullins v. Palmero

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Apr 21, 2009
Case No. 3:08cv00118 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Pullins v. Palmero

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE E. PULLINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN PALMERO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Apr 21, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv00118 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 21, 2009)

Citing Cases

Pac. Life Ins. Co. v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

Fed. Ins. Co. v. CVS Revco D.S., Inc., No. 1:05 CV 1767, 2009 WL 1707898, at *5 (N.D. Ohio June 16, 2009)…

LIMITED SERVICE CORP. v. M/V APL PERU

Thus, factors such as the transferee judge's "familiarity with the facts and circumstances" of the two cases,…