From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pullen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 7, 1934
68 S.W.2d 181 (Tex. Crim. App. 1934)

Opinion

No. 16360.

Delivered February 7, 1934.

Appeal Dismissed — Jurisdiction.

Notice of appeal is essential to confer jurisdiction on reviewing court, and when transcript fails to show such notice, appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from the District Court of Hutchinson County. Tried below before the Hon. E. J. Pickens, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for robbery; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for twelve years.

Appeal dismissed.

The opinion states the case.

H. M. Hood, of Borger, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Robbery with firearms is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for twelve years.

The transcript fails to show any notice of appeal. This is essential to confer jurisdiction on the reviewing court. See article 827, C. C. P., also Shaddox v. State, 45 S.W.2d 980, and cases there cited.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Pullen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 7, 1934
68 S.W.2d 181 (Tex. Crim. App. 1934)
Case details for

Pullen v. State

Case Details

Full title:J. M. PULLEN v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 7, 1934

Citations

68 S.W.2d 181 (Tex. Crim. App. 1934)
68 S.W.2d 181

Citing Cases

Rose v. State

In the absence of such notice appearing in the record, the appeal must be dismissed. See Art. 827, C. C. P.,…

Martin v. State

A dismissal was ordered on May 16, 1934, for the reason that the record failed to show notice of appeal,…