From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puente v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Oct 28, 2020
307 So. 3d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D19-1374

10-28-2020

David PUENTE and Maria C. Puente, Appellants, v. TOWER HILL SIGNATURE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

The Nation Law Firm, and Mark A. Nation, and Paul W. Pritchard (Longwood), for appellants. Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, and Scot E. Samis (St. Petersburg), for appellee.


The Nation Law Firm, and Mark A. Nation, and Paul W. Pritchard (Longwood), for appellants.

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, and Scot E. Samis (St. Petersburg), for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Whitman v. Castlewood Int'l Corp., 383 So. 2d 618, 619 (Fla. 1980) ("[W]here there is no proper objection to the use of a general verdict, reversal is improper where no error is found as to one of two issues submitted to the jury on the basis that the appellant is unable to establish that he has been prejudiced.") (citation omitted); see also State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Lichtman, 227 So. 2d 309, 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969) ("[W]hether a certain set of facts exist to bring a loss to the insured within the terms of a policy is an issue to be determined by the trier of fact.") (citations omitted).


Summaries of

Puente v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Oct 28, 2020
307 So. 3d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Puente v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:David Puente and Maria C. Puente, Appellants, v. Tower Hill Signature…

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Oct 28, 2020

Citations

307 So. 3d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)