From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Public Ser. Truck Renting v. Ambassador Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 12, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The general rule is that "an insurer may not be subrogated to a claim against its own insured, at least when the claim arises from an incident for which the insurer's policy covers that insured" (Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v Austin Powder Co., 68 N.Y.2d 465, 471). In that case, however, the subrogation claim was based upon an express agreement by the insured to indemnify the subrogor for the same risk (see also, Fowler v Stillwater Assocs., 169 A.D.2d 226 [decided herewith], where the insured also expressly agreed to indemnify for the same risk and this Court applied the general rule). In the subject case, the subrogation claim seeks to recover for a breach of the additional insured's promise to provide insurance coverage, an obligation completely distinct from the obligation to indemnify (see, Kinney v Lisk Co., 76 N.Y.2d 215). We conclude that the general rule has no application in this instance.

Supreme Court properly determined that the motions for summary judgment on causes of action asserted by or against Ambassador Insurance Company should be denied and that further proceedings should be stayed during the pendency of liquidation proceedings in Vermont. Although Vermont has not enacted the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act (see, Insurance Law §§ 7408-7415), its statutory scheme is similar in nearly every material respect affecting reciprocity (see, Kelly v Overseas Investors, 24 A.D.2d 157, 160-161, revd on other grounds 18 N.Y.2d 622). Thus, Vermont has enacted the Uniform Act "in substance and effect", and Vermont is a "reciprocal state" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 7408 (b) (6) (Laces Roller Corp. v Ambassador Ins. Co., 134 A.D.2d 408; see also, Murphy v Ambassador Ins. Co., 195 N.J. Super. 274, 478 A.2d 1243). Under the circumstances, a stay of further proceedings in this action would promote the purposes of the Uniform Act and the interests of comity by giving effect to the automatic stay imposed by the liquidation order in Vermont Superior Court.


Summaries of

Public Ser. Truck Renting v. Ambassador Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Public Ser. Truck Renting v. Ambassador Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PUBLIC SERVICE TRUCK RENTING, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMBASSADOR INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
572 N.Y.S.2d 559

Citing Cases

A.B. Med. Servs. PLLC v. Highlands Ins. Co.

Thus, even though Texas has not enacted the UILA, if Texas is a "reciprocal state," N.Y. Ins. Law § 7408…

Herstam v. Dirs., Silvercreek

See Allied Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Ruth, 57 Wn. App. 783, 790 P.2d 206 (1990) (liquidation statutes of…