From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pub. S. Com. v. B. O.R.R. Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 15, 1914
90 A. 119 (Md. 1914)

Opinion

Decided January 15th, 1914.

Decided January 15th, 1914.

Cross-appeals from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (DUFFY, J.)

The appeals were argued together (with the appeals in the preceding case) before BOYD, C.J., BRISCOE, BURKE, THOMAS, PATTISON, URNER, STOCKBRIDGE and CONSTABLE, JJ.

W. Cabell Bruce, for the Public Service Commission.

Wm. Ainsworth Parker and W. Irvine Cross, for the B. O.R.R. Co. et als.


These appeals are from a decree like the one in Nos. 31 and 32 Appeals of the October Term (see ante, page 355).

The appeals were heard together in the Court below, and the evidence relied on by the parties in these appeals is the evidence we have considered in Nos. 31 and 32. What we have said in Nos. 31 and 32 applies to the appeals in this case, and for the reasons there stated the decree of the Court below must be affirmed.

Decree affirmed, each party to pay one-half the costs in this Court.


Summaries of

Pub. S. Com. v. B. O.R.R. Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 15, 1914
90 A. 119 (Md. 1914)
Case details for

Pub. S. Com. v. B. O.R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND vs . THE B. O.R.R. CO. ET ALS. AND…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jan 15, 1914

Citations

90 A. 119 (Md. 1914)
90 A. 119

Citing Cases

MTN. STATES T. T. CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMM. ET AL

Though this is true, it has been held that proof of this similarity between the rates offered, and those in…

Commonwealth of Penna. v. Morris

The defendant could easily and accurately ascertain by reading the indictment what charge he had to answer.…