From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pruitt v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Jun 16, 2009
907 N.E.2d 973 (Ind. 2009)

Opinion

No. 15S00-0512-PD-617.

June 16, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dearborn County, James D. Humphrey, J.

Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender of Indiana, Thomas C. Hinesley, Kathleen Cleary, Laura L. Volk, Deputy Public Defenders, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, James B. Martin, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.


On Petition for Rehearing


For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Pruitt v. State, 903904 N.E.2d 899, 940 (Ind. 2009), I would grant rehearing, vacate the judgment of the post-conviction court, and remand this cause with instructions to impose a term of years.


Summaries of

Pruitt v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Jun 16, 2009
907 N.E.2d 973 (Ind. 2009)
Case details for

Pruitt v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tommy PRUITT, Appellant (Petitioner below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee…

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Jun 16, 2009

Citations

907 N.E.2d 973 (Ind. 2009)

Citing Cases

Weisheit v. State

Even if the trial court's findings and conclusion were verbatim to the State's proposed findings and…

Weisheit v. State

Even if the trial court's findings and conclusion were verbatim to the State's proposed findings and…