From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PRUE v. PRUE

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Dec 18, 1978
395 A.2d 444 (Me. 1978)

Opinion

December 18, 1978.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Penobscot County.

Daniel J. Murphy, Lewiston (orally), for plaintiff.

Vafiades, Brountas Kominsky by Susan R. Kominsky (orally), Marvin H. Glazier, Bangor, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and POMEROY, ARCHIBALD, DELAHANTY and GODFREY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff wife in a divorce action. It follows the denial by the Superior Court of a "motion for Declaratory Relief and for Interpretation". The motion arises from a 1963 reconciliation agreement entered into by the parties.

The ruling from which appeal is sought to be taken is not a final judgment, nor does it fall within any of the statutorily or judicially recognized exceptions to the "final judgment rule". We are unwilling to establish such an exception here. See generally, Maine Central Railroad, et al. v. Bangor Aroostook Railroad, Me., 395 A.2d 1107 (1978), and cases cited therein. See also Gulesian v. Gulesian, Me., 377 A.2d 119, 120 (1977).

Denial of motion for separate support pending divorce held interlocutory and not appealable.

The entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

WERNICK and NICHOLS, JJ., did not sit.


Summaries of

PRUE v. PRUE

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Dec 18, 1978
395 A.2d 444 (Me. 1978)
Case details for

PRUE v. PRUE

Case Details

Full title:Vivian L. PRUE v. Francis J. PRUE

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Dec 18, 1978

Citations

395 A.2d 444 (Me. 1978)

Citing Cases

Prue v. Prue

We dismissed as interlocutory her appeal from that determination. Prue v. Prue, Me., 395 A.2d 444 (1978). The…