From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pro v. Brown

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Jun 16, 2010
CV 310-047 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 16, 2010)

Opinion

CV 310-047.

June 16, 2010


ORDER


After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. no. 2) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must submit a new complaint, along with the full filing fee. Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002) ( per curiam).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pro v. Brown

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Jun 16, 2010
CV 310-047 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Pro v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL KEVIN PRO, Plaintiff, v. BILLY D. BROWN, Warden; TOM GRAMIAK…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

Date published: Jun 16, 2010

Citations

CV 310-047 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 16, 2010)