From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prise v. Frank-McCrary

Appellate Court of Illinois
Jul 11, 1945
326 Ill. App. 514 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)

Opinion

Gen. No. 10,024. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed July 11, 1945 Released for publication July 27, 1945

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 143.3propriety of directed verdict in action for death of pedestrian. In action to recover for death of pedestrian who was struck from rear by automobile while walking on right side of village highway before dawn, where driver left scene of accident, and taxicab which was in operation in vicinity at time of accident was found later same day with damage to right front fender, hood, cowl, and windshield, but was not definitely identified as that involved in accident, and where plaintiff offered no proof that driver of said taxicab was employed by defendant company or that plaintiff's decedent was in the exercise of due care for his own safety, held verdict was properly directed for defendants at close of plaintiff's evidence.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of DuPage county; the Hon. HARRY W. MCEWEN, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in this court at the February term, 1945.

Perry Elliott, for appellant;

Hadley Leren, for appellees;

Charles W. Hadley, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed July 11, 1945; released for publication July 27, 1945.


Summaries of

Prise v. Frank-McCrary

Appellate Court of Illinois
Jul 11, 1945
326 Ill. App. 514 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)
Case details for

Prise v. Frank-McCrary

Case Details

Full title:Agnes La Prise, Administrator of Estate of Harold La Prise, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Jul 11, 1945

Citations

326 Ill. App. 514 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)
62 N.E.2d 26

Citing Cases

Weiland Tool Mfg. Co. v. Whitney

In this situation we will not explore the record, especially where it is so voluminous as in this case, to…

Griffin v. Subram

"In numerous cases it has been held that a party called for examination under section 60 [now section 2-1102]…