From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prince v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 12, 1981
398 So. 2d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. WW-347.

May 13, 1981. Rehearing Denied June 12, 1981.

Petition from the Circuit Court for Duval County, Lawrence D. Fay, J.

Henry E. Davis and Alfred Washington, of Smith, Monroe Washington, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Miguel A. Olivella, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Appellant seeks review of multiple convictions and sentences which we affirm except as to the trial judge's retention of jurisdiction, pursuant to Section 947.16(3) Florida Statutes, for review of any parole release order. This statute was enacted subsequent to the commission of the offenses in the present case and, since it substantively alters appellant's situation to his disadvantage, retroactive application of the provision would be ex post facto in effect and is thus impermissible. State v. Williams, 397 So.2d 663 (Fla. 1981), 6 FLW 263; Rodriquez v. State, 380 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1980); cf., Weaver v. Graham, ___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1980).

Accordingly, we reverse insofar as the trial judge retained jurisdiction to review parole release orders, and remand the cause for deletion of that portion of the orders of commitment. The judgments of conviction and sentences are otherwise affirmed.

SHIVERS and WENTWORTH, JJ., and WILLIAM C. OWEN, Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Prince v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 12, 1981
398 So. 2d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Prince v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN DELANO PRINCE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 12, 1981

Citations

398 So. 2d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Florida Parole Com'n

In other circumstances it has been held to violate the ex post facto clause under the principles discussed in…

Hubbard v. State

Under the circumstances of this case we disagree because application of the direct file statute did not…