From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pre. Ass. v. Uto. Home Care

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 2009
58 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-07549.

January 20, 2009.

In an action to recover on an instrument for the payment of money, brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated July 3, 2008, which denied its motion.

Steven G. Legum, Mineola, N.Y., for appellant.

Ahern Ahern, Kings Park, N.Y. (Dennis P. Ahern of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Spolzino, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing on the amount of the attorney's fee to be awarded to the plaintiff, and thereafter for entry of an appropriate judgment.

The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213 by establishing the existence of an instrument for the payment of a sum certain and the defendant's failure to make the payments called for by its terms ( see Juste v Niewdach, 26 AD3d 416). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact or a meritorious defense ( see Black Rock, Inc. v Z Best Car Wash, Inc., 27 AD3d 409). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the instrument at issue did not require any additional performance on the part of the plaintiff as a condition precedent to repayment, nor did it require the plaintiff to pursue its claim against the defendant's insure r ( see Afco Credit Corp. v Boropark Twelfth Ave. Realty Corp., 187 AD2d 634).

Since, the instrument did not provide for a sum certain with respect to the recovery of an attorney's fee in the event of a default in payment on the instrument, a hearing must be held to determine the amount of such award ( see Borg v Belair Ridge Dev. Corp., 270 AD2d 377, 378).


Summaries of

Pre. Ass. v. Uto. Home Care

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 2009
58 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Pre. Ass. v. Uto. Home Care

Case Details

Full title:PREMIUM ASSIGNMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UTOPIA HOME CARE, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 20, 2009

Citations

58 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 364
871 N.Y.S.2d 724

Citing Cases

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. Scialpi

CPLR § 3213 permits that "[w]hen an action is based upon an instrument for the payment of money only or upon…

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. Scialpi

CPLR § 3213 permits that "[w]hen an action is based upon an instrument for the payment of money only or upon…