From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pratt v. Archstone Willow Glen Apartments

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Mar 6, 2009
NO. C 08-3588 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2009)

Opinion

NO. C 08-3588 JF (RS).

March 6, 2009


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL


Defendant Orkin Exterminating Co. ("Orkin") moves to compel plaintiff Donna Pratt to respond to interrogatory numbers six, seven, ten, and thirteen relating to her past and present medical conditions. This matter came on for hearing on March 6, 2009.

Regarding interrogatory numbers six and seven, Pratt represents that her amended responses encompass her complete recollection regarding each and every doctor or hospital visit over the past fifteen years. Accordingly, no further responses to these interrogatories will be required. If further information becomes available, Pratt remains under an obligation to supplement her responses. Regarding interrogatory numbers ten and thirteen, Pratt merely identifies various paragraphs of her complaint as her response. As a more complete response is warranted, Pratt shall supplement her answers to these interrogatories by March 20, 2009. Finally, Orkin and Pratt each ask for attorney's fees and costs incurred with this motion. Neither Orkin nor Pratt, however, filed their motion for sanctions separately as required by Civil Local Rules 37-3 and 7-8. Even if they had complied with the procedures set forth in those provisions, no basis exists to shift costs in this discovery dispute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pratt v. Archstone Willow Glen Apartments

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Mar 6, 2009
NO. C 08-3588 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Pratt v. Archstone Willow Glen Apartments

Case Details

Full title:DONNA PRATT, Plaintiff, v. ARCHSTONE WILLOW GLEN APARTMENTS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Mar 6, 2009

Citations

NO. C 08-3588 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2009)

Citing Cases

Stonebreaker v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America

A party seeking a court order to extend the time of a deposition must show good cause to justify such an…