From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prather v. BNSF Ry. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Oct 27, 2011
NO. 02-11-00397-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. 02-11-00397-CV

Delivered: October 27, 2011.

Appealed from the 342nd District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


We have considered "Appellant's Motion To Dismiss." It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).


Summaries of

Prather v. BNSF Ry. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Oct 27, 2011
NO. 02-11-00397-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Prather v. BNSF Ry. Co.

Case Details

Full title:KOREY PRATHER APPELLANT v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

NO. 02-11-00397-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2011)

Citing Cases

Manson v. Receivers

The liability for injury by coming in contact with animals trespassing on the track is one of the dangers…

Land Company v. Votaw

Lane Hicks, for Mary J. Votaw. — 1. It is evident from the pleadings and record in the cause tried in the…