From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pragmatus Telecom, LLC v. Trend Micro Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
CASE NO. 12-06195 EM (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12-06195 EM

03-25-2013

PRAGMATUS TELECOM, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, Defendant.

ELIZABETH DAY (SBN 177125) IAN N. FEINBERG (SBN 88234 DAVID ALBERTI (SBM 220625) SAL LIM (SBM 211836) YAKOV ZOLOTOREV (SBM 224260) MARC BELLOLI (SBN 244290) FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI & THOMPSON LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff PRAGMATUS TELECOM, LLC YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY (SBN: 175421) D. STUART BARTOW (SBN: 233107) McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendant TREND MICRO INCORPORATED


ELIZABETH DAY (SBN 177125)
IAN N. FEINBERG (SBN 88234
DAVID ALBERTI (SBM 220625)
SAL LIM (SBM 211836)
YAKOV ZOLOTOREV (SBM 224260)
MARC BELLOLI (SBN 244290)
FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI &
THOMPSON LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PRAGMATUS TELECOM, LLC
YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY (SBN: 175421)
D. STUART BARTOW (SBN: 233107)
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
TREND MICRO INCORPORATED

JOINT STIPULATION

Pragmatus Telecom, LLC ("Pragmatus") and Trend Micro Incorporated ("Trend Micro"), hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. Pragmatus has brought the above-captioned patent infringement action (the "Action") accusing Trend Micro of infringing three patents identified in the Complaint by providing live chat services over the Internet (referred to herein as the "Live Chat Services").

2. Trend Micro represents that any Live Chat Services it has used in the United States during the six years prior to the filing of the Complaint and subsequent to the filing of the Complaint - have been provided by LogMeIn Inc. and LivePerson Inc.

3. On November 21, 2012, LogMeIn filed a declaratory judgment action against Pragmatus, captioned LogMeIn Inc. v. Pragmatus Telecom, LLC (No. 1:12-cv-01507-RGA) (the "LogMeIn Declaratory Judgment Action"), which is currently pending before the District of Delaware, and in which LogMeIn seeks judgments of (1) non-infringement of the patents-in-suit by LogMeIn technology, and (2) invalidity of the patent-in-suit.

6. Pragmatus represents that it anticipates resolution of the LogMeIn Declaratory Judgment Action in the near future, and both Pragmatus and Trend Micro anticipate that the resolution of the LogMeIn Declaratory Judgment Action will resolve this Action with respect to Trend Micro's use of LogMeIn technology.

7. In light of the foregoing, Pragmatus and Trend Micro further stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, that this Action shall be stayed until at least April 26, 2013 in order to permit sufficient time for the LogMeIn Declaratory Judgment Action to resolve and for the parties to resolve any other remaining issues.

8. Pragmatus and Trend Micro will apprise the Court in advance of April 26, 2013 of any future developments that would affect the agreed-upon stay and whether to continue the stay beyond April 26, 2013.

9. In light of the foregoing, Pragmatus and Trend Micro do not believe that ADR needs to be selected at this time.

FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI & THOMPSON LLP

By Marc Belloli

Elizabeth Day

Ian Feinberg

David Alberti

Sal Lim

Yakov Zolotorev

Marc Belloli

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PRAGMATUS TELECOM, LLC

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

By D. Stuart Bartow

Yar R. Chaikovsky

D. Stuart Bartow

Attorneys for Defendant

TREND MICRO INCORPORATED

_____________________

Judge Edward M. Chen

Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request.

By _____________________

Marc Belloli


Summaries of

Pragmatus Telecom, LLC v. Trend Micro Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
CASE NO. 12-06195 EM (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Pragmatus Telecom, LLC v. Trend Micro Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PRAGMATUS TELECOM, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 12-06195 EM (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)