From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prada v. Administrator, Small Business Admin

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 25, 1993
432 S.E.2d 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

A93A0117.

DECIDED MAY 25, 1993.

Writ of possession. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge Galbaugh, pro hac vice.

Humberto O. Prada, pro se. Lawson Davis, James H. Baskin, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a dispossessory action in which a Writ of Possession was ordered on behalf of appellee, Administrator, Small Business Administration (SBA), against appellant, Humberto Prada. The SBA obtained a dispossessory warrant on June 29, 1992, and a trial was held, without a jury, on July 22, 1992 in the State Court of DeKalb County. Prada, appealing pro se, asserts several enumerations of error all raising general grounds. "However, no transcript of the proceeding is present in the record before us. `Where no transcript of evidence is filed all grounds requiring a consideration of evidence must be affirmed. [Cit.]' [Cit.]" Southerland v. Oxford Group, 162 Ga. App. 213 ( 290 S.E.2d 556) (1982). See also P. H. L. Dev. Corp. v. Smith, 174 Ga. App. 328 ( 329 S.E.2d 545) (1985).

Judgment affirmed. Johnson and Smith, JJ., concur.

DECIDED MAY 25, 1993.


Summaries of

Prada v. Administrator, Small Business Admin

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 25, 1993
432 S.E.2d 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Prada v. Administrator, Small Business Admin

Case Details

Full title:PRADA v. ADMINISTRATOR, SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 25, 1993

Citations

432 S.E.2d 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)
208 Ga. App. 710

Citing Cases

Garrett v. McDowell

(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Prada v. Small Business Admin., 208 Ga. App. 710 ( 432 S.E.2d 274)…

Barton v. Barton

The pro se appellants have failed to include in their notice of appeal a statement, as required by OCGA §…