From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powers v. City of Cheyenne

Supreme Court of Wyoming
Feb 5, 1968
436 P.2d 961 (Wyo. 1968)

Opinion

No. 3665.

February 5, 1968.

No appearance for appellants.

Arthur Kline of Kline Tilker, Cheyenne, for appellees.

Before HARNSBERGER, C.J., and GRAY, McINTYRE AND PARKER, JJ.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING


In the case of Powers v. City of Cheyenne, Wyo., 435 P.2d 448, appellees have petitioned for rehearing, suggesting we amplify our opinion by deciding where acceptable deposits of moneys in the hands of the trustee may be made.

In connection with assignment 6, as discussed in our original opinion, although we stated there could be no objection to the deposit of industrial development project funds in national banks in answer to that specific question, this was actually unnecessary. That question had nothing to do with the constitutionality of the industrial development projects act, and plaintiffs were entitled to relief only if they showed the act itself to be unconstitutional.

Questions as to restrictions or limitations, if any, respecting the deposit of project funds in the hands of the trustee are not before us in this appeal.

Rehearing denied.


Summaries of

Powers v. City of Cheyenne

Supreme Court of Wyoming
Feb 5, 1968
436 P.2d 961 (Wyo. 1968)
Case details for

Powers v. City of Cheyenne

Case Details

Full title:TOM W. POWERS, E.H. KRUMM, GEORGE COLE AND CHARLES W. LORDLER, APPELLANTS…

Court:Supreme Court of Wyoming

Date published: Feb 5, 1968

Citations

436 P.2d 961 (Wyo. 1968)

Citing Cases

Witzenburger v. State, Wyo. 1978

In Reed v. City of Cheyenne, Wyo. 1967, 429 P.2d 69, a companion case to Uhls, there was again a split, two…

State ex Rel. Wyo. Farm Loan Bd. v. Herschler

This proposition is fundamental to the "revenue bond" or "special fund" doctrine. Such doctrine is to the…