From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 6, 1988
368 S.E.2d 518 (Ga. 1988)

Opinion

45268.

DECIDED APRIL 6, 1988.

Interlocutory appeal. Emanuel Superior Court. Before Judge Hartley.

Daniel C. B. Levy, for appellant.

Brennan, Harris Rominger, Richard A. Rominger, for appellee.

Richard A. Marchetti, Morton G. Forbes, Wiley A. Wasden III, amici curiae.


This case is before us on the question of whether the court erred in denying plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude evidence of recovery of payments from a collateral source. The collateral source rule was abolished in Georgia pursuant to the Tort Reform Act of 1987, OCGA § 51-12-1 et seq. The question before us is whether this abolition should be applied prospectively or retroactively. This question has been decided by this court in Polito v. Holland, 258 Ga. 54 ( 365 S.E.2d 273) (1988), in which we held that the abolition of the collateral source rule would be applied prospectively only. The present case is controlled by Polito v. Holland, supra.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED APRIL 6, 1988.


Summaries of

Powell v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 6, 1988
368 S.E.2d 518 (Ga. 1988)
Case details for

Powell v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:POWELL v. STEPHENS

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Apr 6, 1988

Citations

368 S.E.2d 518 (Ga. 1988)
368 S.E.2d 518

Citing Cases

Whelchel v. Thomas Ford Tractor, Inc.

(Emphasis supplied.) The admission of collateral source evidence and the giving of the above charge were…

U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Austin

Austin's fall allegedly occurred on or about December 24, 1983, suit was filed on June 14, 1985, and the…