From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 7, 1992
602 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-03103.

August 7, 1992.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County; Lacey Collier, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


This cause is before us on appeal from judgments and sentences for violation of probation, possession of cocaine with intent to sell, and resisting arrest without violence. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief in which he correctly points out that the sentencing order for resisting arrest without violence, a misdemeanor, reflects habitual offender status. We must, therefore, remand this case to the trial court with instructions to delete the habitual offender provision from appellant's sentence for this offense. DuBose v. State, 585 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Peterson v. State, 576 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). The judgments and sentences are otherwise affirmed.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

BOOTH, SMITH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Powell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 7, 1992
602 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Powell v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEOTIS POWELL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 7, 1992

Citations

602 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)