From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Ellis

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 7, 2007
Case No. 3:07cv160/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2007)

Summary

holding prisoner had no liberty interest in particular job assignment or custody classification

Summary of this case from Reis v. Augustine

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv160/MCR/EMT.

September 7, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated August 3, 2007. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's second amended complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Powell v. Ellis

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 7, 2007
Case No. 3:07cv160/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2007)

holding prisoner had no liberty interest in particular job assignment or custody classification

Summary of this case from Reis v. Augustine

holding that prisoner had no liberty interest in particular job assignment or custody classification

Summary of this case from Martell v. Sec'y, Dept. of Corr.

holding that plaintiff had no protected interest in particular classification

Summary of this case from Shaarbay v. Smith

finding the inmate was not denied due process when his legal papers were destroyed because Florida's statute provided a remedy for the deprivation

Summary of this case from Lindsay v. Brogden

finding the inmate was not denied due process when his legal papers were destroyed because Florida's statute provided a remedy for the deprivation

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Brown
Case details for

Powell v. Ellis

Case Details

Full title:KEITH J. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. D. ELLIS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Sep 7, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:07cv160/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2007)

Citing Cases

Shaarbay v. Smith

He complains of a change in his classification status; however, a prisoner has no constitutional right to a…

Reis v. Augustine

and changes in classification status do not require due process protections); Griffin v. Vaughn, 112 F.3d…