In Powell, a panel of this Court found that the petitioner had been deprived of his right to expert psychological assistance at the sentencing phase of his trial.
Summary of this case from Smith v. MitchellNo. 98-4053.
Argued: November 28, 2000.
Decided and Filed: May 7, 2003. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206.
THIS CASE HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN FROM THE BOUND VOLUME AT THE REQUEST OF THE COURT. SEE: 332 F.3d 376.
In Powell, a panel of this Court found that the petitioner had been deprived of his right to expert psychological assistance at the sentencing phase of his trial.
Summary of this case from Smith v. Mitchellnoting that Dr. Schmidtgoessling testified at petitioner Powell's sentencing hearing that "she was not given sufficient time to conduct an appropriate investigation into Petitioner's mental makeup, to interview necessary family members and acquaintances, or to run needed diagnostic tests"
Summary of this case from Smith v. MitchellFull title:Tony M. Powell, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry Collins, Warden…
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: May 7, 2003
We may not issue a writ of habeas corpus unless the state court proceedings were fundamentally unfair as a…
Powell v. CollinsGILMAN, Circuit Judge. Following the issuance of this court's opinion, found at 328 F.3d 268 (6th Cir. 2003),…