From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poulan v. Gallagher

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Jun 5, 1933
148 So. 511 (La. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

No. 4449.

June 5, 1933.

Appeal from City Court of Monroe, Parish of Ouachita; W.M. Harper, Judge.

On application for rehearing.

Application refused.

For former opinion, see 147 So. 723.

Theus, Grisham, Davis Leigh of Monroe, for appellant.

W.A. Walker, Jr., of Monroe, for appellee.


The attorneys for defendant and appellant urge that a rehearing should be granted in this case, which is one sounding in damages, because of the allowance of interest, which was not prayed for, on the judgment from date of judicial demand.

This interest was correctly allowed on the authority of Act No. 206 of 1916 as construed in the case of Grennon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 17 La. App. 700, 136 So. 309, which holds that interest automatically becomes due on judgment for damages from date of judicial demand, though not prayed for or mentioned in the judgment.

The application for a rehearing is refused.


Summaries of

Poulan v. Gallagher

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Jun 5, 1933
148 So. 511 (La. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

Poulan v. Gallagher

Case Details

Full title:POULAN v. GALLAGHER

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit

Date published: Jun 5, 1933

Citations

148 So. 511 (La. Ct. App. 1933)

Citing Cases

Layne v. Louisiana Power Light Co.

"Interest need not be prayed for or mentioned in the judgment to entitle a successful litigant in an action…

Hollis v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

This is so because of the nature of the action and of statutory direction. Act No. 206 of 1916; Poulan v.…