Opinion
Argued December 3, 1890
Decided December 16, 1890
Julien T. Davies for appellants.
J. Langdon Ward for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Post v. the Manhattan Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 16, 1890
26 N.E. 14 (N.Y. 1890)
Summaries of
Post v. the Manhattan Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 16, 1890
26 N.E. 14 (N.Y. 1890)
Case details for
Post v. the Manhattan Ry. Co.
Case Details
Full title:WRIGHT E. POST, Respondent, v . THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 16, 1890
Citations
26 N.E. 14 (N.Y. 1890)
26 N.E. 14
34 N.Y. St. Rptr. 590
Citing Cases
W.S. Bank v. Town of Solon
That is a mistake. I thought the point settled upon authority in that case was small, but at least it was…
Sears v. WiseFor these reasons we think the rule should be here applied that a case must be disposed of on appeal on the…