From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Possehl v. Employment Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 28, 1975
541 P.2d 1062 (Or. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 75-AB-405, CA 4716

Argued September 22, 1975.

Affirmed October 28, 1975.

Judicial Review from Employment Division Appeals Board.

Henry R. Dickerson, Jr., Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Division. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

No appearance for respondent Agripac, Inc.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and LANGTRY and FOLEY, Judges.

AFFIRMED.


Claimant seeks unemployment benefits for certain weeks during which he was enrolled in a college course which required attendance in class from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

The referee held against the claimant on the ground that he was not sufficiently available for work within the meaning of ORS 657.155(1)(c) which reads in pertinent part:

"He is able to work, is available for work, and is actively seeking and unable to obtain suitable work * * *."

The Employment Appeals Board affirmed the referee as do we. Evjen v. Employment Division, 22 Or. App. 372, 539 P.2d 662 (1975), and Brown v. Employment Division, 22 Or. App. 382, 539 P.2d 666 (1975), are dispositive of this case.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Possehl v. Employment Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 28, 1975
541 P.2d 1062 (Or. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Possehl v. Employment Division

Case Details

Full title:POSSEHL, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION ET AL, Respondents

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 28, 1975

Citations

541 P.2d 1062 (Or. Ct. App. 1975)
541 P.2d 1062

Citing Cases

Wardell v. Employment Division

SCHWAB, C. J. See, Possehl v. Employment Division, 23 Or. App. 189, 541 P.2d 1062 (decided this date); Evjen…