From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portland Elec. Plum. v. Simpson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 6, 1983
61 Or. App. 266 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 41-169; CA A21377

On appellant's reconsideration filed October 27, 1982, reconsideration allowed,

Former opinion ( 59 Or. App. 486, 651 P.2d 172) adhered to January 12, 1983 Reconsideration denied March 4, petition for review denied April 6, 1983 ( 294 Or. 682)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County. Jon B. Lund, Judge.

On appellant's petition for reconsideration filed October 27, 1982. Former opinion filed September 29, 1982, 59 Or. App. 486, 651 P.2d 172.

James B. Richardson, Beaverton, and Rueppell, Crow Richardson, Beaverton, for petition.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.


WARDEN, J.

Petition for reconsideration allowed. Former opinion adhered to.


Defendant Simpson had petitioned the Supreme Court for review of our decision in Portland Elec. Plum. v. Simpson, 59 Or. App. 486, 651 P.2d 172 (1982). The petition for review constitutes a petition for reconsideration by this court. ORAP 10.10. We grant the petition but adhere to our former opinion.

Each of defendant's checks contained a stamped form of release of lien rights, providing that endorsement of the check constituted execution of the release. The check containing the release in issue was dated March 10, 1980, and was in the amount of $37,260. We held that the release was effective only as to a lien for materials delivered through February 25, 1980.

In reviewing the exhibits again, in the process of our reconsideration, we note that the release form on the back of the check dated March 10, 1980, does not run in favor of this defendant. The release on each of the other checks runs to:

"HOLLY TREE ASSO. LTD. 5355 MURRAY BLVD. S.W. BEAVERTON, OREGON 97005 or the owner thereof * * *."

The release on the back of the check dated March 10, 1980, runs to:

"WOODLAND PARK PROPERTIES LTD. 280 12th STREET HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 or the owner thereof * * *."

"Woodland Park Properties Ltd." is not a party to this action and neither it nor its owner is identified in the record. Assuming arguendo that the release operated to release all liens of plaintiff up to the date of the check, it could not run in favor of defendant because he was not the party named in the release.

Reconsideration granted; former opinion adhered to.


Summaries of

Portland Elec. Plum. v. Simpson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 6, 1983
61 Or. App. 266 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Portland Elec. Plum. v. Simpson

Case Details

Full title:PORTLAND ELECTRIC PLUMBING CO., Respondent — Cross-Appellant, v. SIMPSON…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 6, 1983

Citations

61 Or. App. 266 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
656 P.2d 394

Citing Cases

Portland Elec. Plum. v. Simpson

Argued and submitted April 14, 1982. Reversed and remanded with instructions September 29, 1982,…

Metropolitan Federal Bank v. A.J. Allen

In interpreting the meaning of written instruments such as these lien waiver documents, we seek to give…