From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Porter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 10, 1946
270 App. Div. 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Summary

In Porter v. Stanley, 47 Me. 515, it appeared that Stanley was collector of taxes for the years 1854, 1855, and 1856, and gave bonds with different sureties.

Summary of this case from Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Parker

Opinion

June 10, 1946.


Order denying appellant's motion to modify a final decree of divorce by increasing the amount awarded for her support, and for other relief, affirmed, without costs. While the court has the power to modify or vary the decree in respect of the amount of alimony awarded, upon the proof in this record such modification is not warranted. Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Porter v. Porter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 10, 1946
270 App. Div. 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

In Porter v. Stanley, 47 Me. 515, it appeared that Stanley was collector of taxes for the years 1854, 1855, and 1856, and gave bonds with different sureties.

Summary of this case from Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Parker
Case details for

Porter v. Porter

Case Details

Full title:ANNE M. PORTER, Appellant, v. STANLEY PORTER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 10, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

United States v. Curtis

He had no right to credit himself with the amount of funds stolen from him ( United States v. Prescott, 3…

People v. Hammond

Therefore it is that the delinquent officer in such cases, having committed no wrong during his second term,…