From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poole v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 3, 2005
546 U.S. 913 (2005)

Summary

In Poole, that evidence consisted of a medical evaluation establishing that the plaintiff suffered from a "delusional disorder" that required hospitalizations; the court found that evidence was sufficient to demonstrate that his waiver was involuntary.

Summary of this case from Williams v. United States

Opinion

No. 05-5685.

October 3, 2005.


Certiorari Denied

C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 407 F. 3d 767.


Summaries of

Poole v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 3, 2005
546 U.S. 913 (2005)

In Poole, that evidence consisted of a medical evaluation establishing that the plaintiff suffered from a "delusional disorder" that required hospitalizations; the court found that evidence was sufficient to demonstrate that his waiver was involuntary.

Summary of this case from Williams v. United States

In Poole, that evidence consisted of a medical evaluation establishing that the plaintiff suffered from a "delusional disorder" that required hospitalizations; the court found that evidence was sufficient to demonstrate that his waiver was involuntary.

Summary of this case from Williams v. U.S.

In Poole, an army lieutenant was found to be 30% disabled due to a "delusional disorder, persecutory type, manifested by exaggerated concerns that co-workers have bugged his home, office, and car."

Summary of this case from Stine v. U.S.

In Poole, the court addressed whether the service member waived objections to his disability rating when he concurred in the PEB's recommendation.

Summary of this case from Dean v. U.S.

In Poole, the court addressed whether the service member waived objections to his disability rating when he concurred in the PEB's recommendation.

Summary of this case from Dean v. U.S.
Case details for

Poole v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:POOLE v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 3, 2005

Citations

546 U.S. 913 (2005)
126 S. Ct. 279

Citing Cases

Williams v. U.S.

The government contends that if Mr. Williams retired voluntarily he is not eligible to bring his claim in…

Williams v. United States

The government contends that if Mr. Williams retired voluntarily he is not eligible to bring his claim in…