From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pomeroy v. Gregory

Supreme Court of California
Apr 8, 1885
66 Cal. 574 (Cal. 1885)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Monterey County refusing a new trial.

         COUNSEL:

         Section 7 of the insolvent act of 1880, authorizing a service of the notice to creditors either by mail or personally, should be construed that if the creditor is a non-resident he may be served by mail; otherwise, the service must be personal.

         Wm. H. Webb, for Appellant.

          N. A. Dorn, and W. M. R. Parker, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         THE COURT

         1. Defendant could be discharged, under the insolvent act of 1880, from a debt contracted in 1878. (Hundley v. Chaney , 65 Cal. 363.)

         2. The act of 1880, p. 83, § 7, authorizes a service by mail or personally. Either form of service is sufficient.

         Orders affirmed.


Summaries of

Pomeroy v. Gregory

Supreme Court of California
Apr 8, 1885
66 Cal. 574 (Cal. 1885)
Case details for

Pomeroy v. Gregory

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE POMEROY, Appellant, v. JOSEPH GREGORY, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 8, 1885

Citations

66 Cal. 574 (Cal. 1885)
6 P. 493

Citing Cases

Pomeroy v. Gregory

Plaintiff further contends, the court failed to find that defendant had been discharged from his debts. If it…

Estate of Treat

The order is satisfied so far as she is concerned. (Estate of Hamilton, 66 Cal. 576, [6 P. 493].) See, also,…