From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polly v. Arony

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1919
188 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Summary

In Polly v. Arony (172 N.Y.S. 305; affd., 188 A.D. 886) section 96, subdivision 4, is construed, and it is stated: "If the article sold is designated by a particular brand * * * the obligation of the seller is fulfilled if he delivers goods known by that brand although they are not in fact of good quality * * * provided the goods delivered are of merchantable quality."

Summary of this case from Foley v. Liggett Myers Tobacco Co., Inc.

Opinion

April, 1919.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.


Determination modified as directed in order and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Polly v. Arony

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1919
188 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

In Polly v. Arony (172 N.Y.S. 305; affd., 188 A.D. 886) section 96, subdivision 4, is construed, and it is stated: "If the article sold is designated by a particular brand * * * the obligation of the seller is fulfilled if he delivers goods known by that brand although they are not in fact of good quality * * * provided the goods delivered are of merchantable quality."

Summary of this case from Foley v. Liggett Myers Tobacco Co., Inc.
Case details for

Polly v. Arony

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL POLLY and Another, Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. HARRY ARONY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1919

Citations

188 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Citing Cases

Outhwaite v. A. B. Knowlson Co.

So, defendant did not impliedly warrant that Elastica was good in any way or in any degree for plaintiff's…

Foley v. Liggett Myers Tobacco Co., Inc.

In McClung v. Kelley ( 21 Iowa 508) it is said that the article shall not have any remarkable defect. In…