From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pollock v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 23, 1996
666 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-3984.

January 23, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County; Peter L. Dearing, Judge.

Appellant pro se.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Terry Carley, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


We affirm without discussion appellant's conviction and sentence. However, we strike from the judgment the requirement that appellant pay $27.50 in court costs, listed on the line identified as "Other," because no statutory authority is cited to support such a cost award, and no explanation is provided as to what this cost represents. On remand, the trial court may reimpose such cost, provided that a legal basis for its imposition is recited. E.g., Bradshaw v. State, 638 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pollock v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 23, 1996
666 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Pollock v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHIUS POLLOCK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 23, 1996

Citations

666 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

However, we strike the requirement that Thomas pay $27.50 in court costs because there is no reference to…

Mitchell v. State

State v. Beasley, 580 So.2d 139 (Fla. 1991); Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc).…