From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pollard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 8, 1933
57 S.W.2d 139 (Tex. Crim. App. 1933)

Opinion

No. 15854.

Delivered February 8, 1933.

1. — Misdemeanor Theft — County Court — Complaint — Information.

All prosecutions originating in county courts for violations of criminal statutes must be by information supported by valid complaint.

2. — County Court — Information.

Where information is not copied in transcript, conviction in county court must be reversed.

Appeal from the County Court of Yoakum County. Tried below before the Hon. Joe B. Hassell, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction in the County Court for misdemeanor theft; penalty, a fine of $10.

Reversed and remanded.

The opinion states the case.

P. G. Stanford, of Plains, and R. L. Graves, of Brownfield, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Conviction in the county court of misdemeanor theft; punishment, a fine of $10.

We are met at the beginning of our consideration of this case with the fact that the record contains no information. We find two copies of complaints, but, if there was any information presented, same is omitted from the transcript. All prosecutions originating in county courts for violations of criminal statutes are necessarily by information supported by a valid complaint. We uniformly hold that, if the information be not copied in the transcript, the case must be reversed. Ethridge v State, 76 Tex.Crim. Rep.. In the last mentioned case many authorities are cited appearing in Branch's Ann. P. C., sec. 520, supporting the proposition that, in a prosecution for a misdemeanor in the county courts, there must be an information which is based upon a complaint, and that when there is no information such prosecution cannot be maintained. It is possible that there was a proper information, and that same has been omitted from the record through inadvertence, and, if so, this error can be corrected upon motion for rehearing. The prosecution will not be ordered dismissed, because if there was a valid complaint originally filed in the county court, there can still be filed a valid information predicated on such complaint.

For the absence of an information, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Pollard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 8, 1933
57 S.W.2d 139 (Tex. Crim. App. 1933)
Case details for

Pollard v. State

Case Details

Full title:WINSTON POLLARD v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 8, 1933

Citations

57 S.W.2d 139 (Tex. Crim. App. 1933)
57 S.W.2d 139

Citing Cases

Adcock v. State

See Ethridge v. State, 76 Tex.Crim. R., 172 S.W. 784; Norton v. State, 120 Tex.Crim. R., 47 S.W.2d 610, and…