From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polite v. Vip Cmty. Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 13, 2020
20-CV-7631 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-7631 (LLS)

10-13-2020

DERRICK POLITE, Plaintiff, v. VIP COMMUNITY SERVICES, Defendant.


ORDER TO AMEND :

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), alleging that his former employer discriminated and retaliated against him by not providing him with equal pay and by terminating his employment. By order dated October 2, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within sixty days of the date of this order.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Court must dismiss an IFP complaint, or any portion of the complaint, that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see Livingston v. Adirondack Beverage Co., 141 F.3d 434, 437 (2d Cir. 1998). The Court must also dismiss a complaint when the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

While the law mandates dismissal on any of these grounds, the Court is obliged to construe pro se pleadings liberally, Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009), and interpret them to raise the "strongest [claims] that they suggest," Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) (emphasis in original). But the "special solicitude" in pro se cases, id. at 475 (citation omitted), has its limits - to state a claim, pro se pleadings still must comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires a complaint to make a short and plain statement showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.

The Supreme Court has held that under Rule 8, a complaint must include enough facts to state a claim for relief "that is plausible on its face." Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). A claim is facially plausible if the plaintiff pleads enough factual detail to allow the Court to draw the inference that the defendant is liable for the alleged misconduct. In reviewing the complaint, the Court must accept all well-pleaded factual allegations as true. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009). But it does not have to accept as true "[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action," which are essentially just legal conclusions. Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555. After separating legal conclusions from well-pleaded factual allegations, the Court must determine whether those facts make it plausible - not merely possible - that the pleader is entitled to relief. Id.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff brings this employment discrimination action against his former employer, the VIP Community Services (VIP) located in the Bronx. The complaint is not a model of clarity, but Plaintiff asserts that he is bringing claims under Title VII for VIP's failure to provide him with equal pay and retaliation against him. (See ECF No. 2, at 2.) He provides the following statement as the facts in support of his case:

During my initial complaint I failed to provide the witness to the event which lead VIP to terminate my employment. It was recommended, I submit this claim in efforts to honor the request of my retroactive pay along with my reasons for termination. Lastly, along with the age difference of the previous Clinical Director there was no reason to decrease my pay, especially with both parties having the
same credentially. In closing, under the Ryan White program all parties were paid according to the salary aside from me.
(Id. at 5.)

Plaintiff also attaches to the complaint a letter addressed to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in which he asserts additional facts. He states in the letter that he was employed by VIP as the Clinical Director of the Ryan White Program and that his employment was terminated after he reported a coworker's inappropriate touching of two staff members, and another coworker's calling of staff members by racist and other derogatory names. (See id. at 11-12.) Plaintiff also asserts that he was subjected to age discrimination because the former Clinical Director, who was younger, was paid more than him.

DISCUSSION

A. Claims under Title VII and the ADEA

Plaintiff brings claims under Title VII, and his assertions that he was subjected to age discrimination suggest a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. Title VII provides that "[i]t shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer . . . to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex or national origin." 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a). Similarly, the ADEA makes it unlawful for an employer to "discharge any individual or otherwise discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's age." 29 U.S.C. § 623(a). These antidiscrimination provisions prohibit employers from mistreating an individual because of the individual's protected characteristics, Patane v. Clark, 508 F.3d 106, 112 (2d Cir. 2007), or retaliating against an employee who has opposed any practice made unlawful by those statutes, see Crawford v. Metro. Gov't, 555 U.S. 271, 276 (2009) (holding that conduct is protected when it "confront[s]," "resist[s]," or "withstand[s]" unlawful actions).

Mistreatment at work that occurs for a reason other than an employee's protected characteristic or opposition to unlawful conduct is not actionable under these federal antidiscrimination statutes. See Chukwuka v. City of New York, 513 F. App'x 34, 36 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting Brown v. Henderson, 257 F.3d 246, 252 (2d Cir. 2001)). To state a claim for employment discrimination, "a plaintiff must plausibly allege that (1) the employer took adverse employment action against him, and (2) his race, color, religion, sex, [] national origin [or other impermissible factor] was a motivating factor in the employment decision." Vega v. Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist., 801 F.3d 72, 86 (2d Cir. 2015). The plaintiff "may do so by alleging facts that directly show discrimination or facts that indirectly show discrimination by giving rise to a plausible inference of discrimination." Id. at 87. It is not enough for a plaintiff to say, for example, "I am black and these bad things happened to me at work"; he must allege facts from which a reasonable trier of facts could infer that the reason these things happened to him was because of his race. Similarly, even if a plaintiff meets the age criteria for an ADEA claim - forty or older - he must allege facts suggesting that the alleged adverse acts occurred because of his age.

Even read as leniently as possible, Plaintiff fails to allege facts suggesting that his employer discriminated and retaliated against him based on the factors prohibited by Title VII and the ADEA. In fact, nowhere in the complaint does he identify his race, color, religion, national origin, or age. Plaintiff does not allege any facts suggesting a plausible Title VII or ADEA claim - that Defendant discriminated and retaliated against him based on his race, color, sex, religion, national origin, or age.

Because the Court cannot say at this stage that an amendment would be futile, the Court grants Plaintiff sixty-days' leave to submit an amended complaint. See Hill v. Curcione, 657 F.3d 116, 123-24 (2d Cir. 2011). Should he choose to amend his complaint, he must allege facts suggesting that Defendant took adverse employment action against him in violation of Title VII or the ADEA. B. Application for Pro Bono Counsel

Plaintiff also submits an application for the court to request pro bono counsel. The factors to be considered in ruling on an indigent litigant's request for counsel include the merits of the case, Plaintiff's efforts to obtain a lawyer, and Plaintiff's ability to gather the facts and present the case if unassisted by counsel. See Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989); Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 60-62 (2d Cir. 1986). Of these, the merits are "[t]he factor which command[s] the most attention." Cooper, 877 F.2d at 172. Because it is too early in the proceedings for the Court to assess the merits of the action, Plaintiff's motion for counsel is denied without prejudice to renewal at a later date.

LEAVE TO AMEND

Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint to detail his Title VII and ADEA claims. In the statement of claim, Plaintiff must provide a short and plain statement of the relevant facts supporting each claim against each defendant named in the amended complaint. Plaintiff is also directed to provide the addresses for any named defendants. To the greatest extent possible, Plaintiff's amended complaint must:

a) give the names and titles of all relevant persons;

b) describe all relevant events, stating the facts that support Plaintiff's case including what each defendant did or failed to do;

c) give the dates and times of each relevant event or, if not known, the approximate date and time of each relevant event;

d) give the location where each relevant event occurred;
e) describe how each defendant's acts or omissions violated Plaintiff's rights and describe the injuries Plaintiff suffered; and

f) state what relief Plaintiff seeks from the Court, such as money damages, injunctive relief, or declaratory relief.

Essentially, the body of Plaintiff's amended complaint must tell the Court: who violated his federally protected rights; what facts show that his federally protected rights were violated; when such violation occurred; where such violation occurred; and why Plaintiff is entitled to relief. Because Plaintiff's amended complaint will completely replace, not supplement, the original complaint, any facts or claims that Plaintiff wishes to maintain must be included in the amended complaint.

CONCLUSION

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint that complies with the standards set forth above. Plaintiff must submit the amended complaint to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within sixty days of the date of this order, caption the document as an "Amended Complaint," and label the document with docket number 20-CV-7631 (LLS). An Amended Complaint for Employment Discrimination form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, and he cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Plaintiff's application for counsel (ECF No. 4) is denied without prejudice to renewal at a later date. All other pending matters are terminated. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

Louis L. Stanton

U.S.D.J. __________ Write the full name of each plaintiff. -against- __________ Write the full name of each defendant. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section I. ___CV__________
(Include case number if one has been assigned) Do you want a jury trial? [ ] Yes [ ] No

EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT


NOTICE

The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual's full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual's birth; a minor's initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2.

I. PARTIES

A. Plaintiff Information

Provide the following information for each plaintiff named in the complaint. Attach additional pages if needed. __________
First Name __________
Middle Initial __________
Last Name __________
Street Address __________
County, City __________
State __________
Zip Code __________
Telephone Number

__________

Email Address (if available)

B. Defendant Information

To the best of your ability, provide addresses where each defendant may be served. If the correct information is not provided, it could delay or prevent service of the complaint on the defendant. Make sure that the defendants listed below are the same as those listed in the caption. (Proper defendants under employment discrimination statutes are usually employers, labor organizations, or employment agencies.) Attach additional pages if needed. Defendant 1:

__________

Name

__________

Address where defendant may be served

__________

County, City

__________

State

__________

Zip Code Defendant 2:

__________

Name

__________

Address where defendant may be served

__________

County, City

__________

State

__________

Zip Code Defendant 3:

__________

Name

__________

Address where defendant may be served

__________

County, City

__________

State

__________

Zip Code

II. PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT

The address at which I was employed or sought employment by the defendant(s) is: __________
Name __________
Address __________
County, City __________
State __________
Zip Code

III. CAUSE OF ACTION

A. Federal Claims

This employment discrimination lawsuit is brought under (check only the options below that apply in your case):

[ ] Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, for employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin

The defendant discriminated against me because of my (check only those that apply and explain):

[ ] race: __________

[ ] color: __________

[ ] religion: __________

[ ] sex: __________

[ ] national origin: __________
[ ] 42 U.S.C. § 1981, for intentional employment discrimination on the basis of race

My race is: __________

[ ] Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634, for employment discrimination on the basis of age (40 or older)

I was born in the year: __________

[ ] Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 796, for employment discrimination on the basis of a disability by an employer that constitutes a program or activity receiving federal financial assistance

My disability or perceived disability is: __________

[ ] Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, for employment discrimination on the basis of a disability

My disability or perceived disability is: __________

[ ] Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 to 2654, for employment discrimination on the basis of leave for qualified medical or family reasons

B. Other Claims

In addition to my federal claims listed above, I assert claims under:

[ ] New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 290 to 297, for employment discrimination on the basis of age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, marital status

[ ] New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y. City Admin. Code §§ 8-101 to 131, for employment discrimination on the basis of actual or perceived age, race, creed, color, national origin, gender, disability, marital status, partnership status, sexual orientation, alienage, citizenship status

[ ] Other (may include other relevant federal, state, city, or county law): __________

IV. STATEMENT OF CLAIM

A. Adverse Employment Action

The defendant or defendants in this case took the following adverse employment actions against me (check only those that apply):

[ ] did not hire me

[ ] terminated my employment

[ ] did not promote me

[ ] did not accommodate my disability

[ ] provided me with terms and conditions of employment different from those of similar employees

[ ] retaliated against me

[ ] harassed me or created a hostile work environment

[ ] other (specify): __________

B. Facts

State here the facts that support your claim. Attach additional pages if needed. You should explain what actions defendants took (or failed to take) because of your protected characteristic, such as your race, disability, age, or religion. Include times and locations, if possible. State whether defendants are continuing to commit these acts against you. __________ As additional support for your claim, you may attach any charge of discrimination that you filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the New York State Division of Human Rights, the New York City Commission on Human Rights, or any other government agency.

V. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

For most claims under the federal employment discrimination statutes, before filing a lawsuit, you must first file a charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and receive a Notice of Right to Sue. Did you file a charge of discrimination against the defendant(s) with the EEOC or any other government agency?

[ ] Yes (Please attach a copy of the charge to this complaint.)

When did you file your charge? __________

[ ] No
Have you received a Notice of Right to Sue from the EEOC?
[ ] Yes (Please attach a copy of the Notice of Right to Sue.)

What is the date on the Notice? __________

When did you receive the Notice? __________

[ ] No

VI. RELIEF

The relief I want the court to order is (check only those that apply):

[ ] direct the defendant to hire me

[ ] direct the defendant to re-employ me

[ ] direct the defendant to promote me

[ ] direct the defendant to reasonably accommodate my religion

[ ] direct the defendant to reasonably accommodate my disability

[ ] direct the defendant to (specify) (if you believe you are entitled to money damages, explain that here)

__________

VII. PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATION

By signing below, I certify to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief that: (1) the complaint is not being presented for an improper purpose (such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation); (2) the claims are supported by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument to change existing law; (3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the complaint otherwise complies with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. I agree to notify the Clerk's Office in writing of any changes to my mailing address. I understand that my failure to keep a current address on file with the Clerk's Office may result in the dismissal of my case. Each Plaintiff must sign and date the complaint. Attach additional pages if necessary. If seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees, each plaintiff must also submit an IFP application. __________
Dated

__________

Plaintiff's Signature __________
First Name __________
Middle Initial __________
Last Name __________
Street Address __________
County, City __________
State __________
Zip Code __________
Telephone Number

__________

Email Address (if available) I have read the attached Pro Se (Nonprisoner) Consent to Receive Documents Electronically: [ ] Yes [ ] No

If you do consent to receive documents electronically, submit the completed form with your complaint. If you do not consent, please do not attach the form.

Pro Se (Nonprisoner) Consent to Receive Documents Electronically

Parties who are not represented by an attorney and are not currently incarcerated may choose to receive documents in their cases electronically (by e-mail) instead of by regular mail. Receiving documents by regular mail is still an option, but if you would rather receive them only electronically, you must do the following:

1. Sign up for a PACER login and password by contacting PACER at www.pacer.uscourts.gov or 1-800-676-6856;

2. Complete and sign this form.
If you consent to receive documents electronically, you will receive a Notice of Electronic Filing by e-mail each time a document is filed in your case. After receiving the notice, you are permitted one "free look" at the document by clicking on the hyperlinked document number in the e-mail. Once you click the hyperlink and access the document, you may not be able to access the document for free again. After 15 days, the hyperlink will no longer provide free access. Any time that the hyperlink is accessed after the first "free look" or the 15 days, you will be asked for a PACER login and may be charged to view the document. For this reason, you should print or save the document during the "free look" to avoid future charges.

Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) (www.pacer.uscourts.gov) is an electronic public access service that allows users to obtain case and docket information from federal appellate, district, and bankruptcy courts, and the PACER Case Locator over the internet.

You must review the Court's actual order, decree, or judgment and not rely on the description in the email notice alone. See ECF Rule 4.3

IMPORTANT NOTICE

Under Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Civil Rule 5.2, and the Court's Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions, documents may be served by electronic means. If you register for electronic service:

1. You will no longer receive documents in the mail;

2. If you do not view and download your documents during your "free look" and within 15 days of when the court sends the e-mail notice, you will be charged for looking at the documents;

3. This service does not allow you to electronically file your documents;

4. It will be your duty to regularly review the docket sheet of the case.

The docket sheet is the official record of all filings in a case. You can view the docket sheet, including images of electronically filed documents, using PACER or you can use one of the public access computers available in the Clerk's Office at the Court.

CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE

I hereby consent to receive electronic service of notices and documents in my case(s) listed below. I affirm that:

1. I have regular access to my e-mail account and to the internet and will check regularly for Notices of Electronic Filing;

2. I have established a PACER account;

3. I understand that electronic service is service under Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 5.2 of the Local Civil Rules, and that I will no longer receive paper copies of case filings, including motions, decisions, orders, and other documents;

4. I will promptly notify the Court if there is any change in my personal data, such as name, address, or e-mail address, or if I wish to cancel this consent to electronic service;

5. I understand that I must regularly review the docket sheet of my case so that I do not miss a filing; and

6. I understand that this consent applies only to the cases listed below and that if I file additional cases in which I would like to receive electronic service of notices of documents, I must file consent forms for those cases.

Civil case(s) filed in the Southern District of New York:

Note: This consent will apply to all cases that you have filed in this court, so please list all of your pending and terminated cases. For each case, include the case name and docket number (for example, John Doe v. New City, 10-CV-01234).

__________
__________
Name (Last, First, MI) __________
Address __________
City __________
State __________
Zip Code __________
Telephone Number __________
E-mail Address __________
Date __________
Signature

Return completed form to:

Pro Se Intake Unit (Room 200) 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007


Summaries of

Polite v. Vip Cmty. Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 13, 2020
20-CV-7631 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Polite v. Vip Cmty. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK POLITE, Plaintiff, v. VIP COMMUNITY SERVICES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 13, 2020

Citations

20-CV-7631 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2020)

Citing Cases

Pippin v. Silas

Polite v. VIP Cmty. Servs., No. 20-CV-7631, 2020 WL 6064297, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2020). “Because…

Johnson v. Knox Cnty. Sch. Bd.

“Because Plaintiff's amended complaint will completely replace, not supplement, the original complaint, any…