From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poindexter v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1931
160 S.E. 923 (N.C. 1931)

Opinion

(Filed 28 October, 1931.)

Appeal and Error J d — Burden of showing error is on appellant.

The burden of showing error on appeal is on the appellant, it being presumed that the judgment of the lower court is correct, and where the appellant fails to overcome this presumption the judgment will be affirmed.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Cranmer, J., at July Term, 1931, of LEE.

H. M. Jackson for plaintiff.

Robinson, Downing Downing for defendant.


Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent burning of about 35 acres of plaintiff's plantation and timber land.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence, he appeals.


The plaintiff on his appeal to this Court has failed to overcome the presumption against error. The testimony of his witnesses falls short of the desired result on appeal, because of its indefiniteness and uncertainty as to the origin of the fire.

The burden is on appellant to show error. It is not presumed. Jackson v. Bell, ante, 336; Bailey v. McKay, 198 N.C. 638, 152 S.E. 893.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Poindexter v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1931
160 S.E. 923 (N.C. 1931)
Case details for

Poindexter v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:C. E. POINDEXTER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1931

Citations

160 S.E. 923 (N.C. 1931)
160 S.E. 923

Citing Cases

State v. Davis

We, therefore, conclude, without impinging upon the rule announced in Wadford's case, that fatal error has…

State v. Garner

In the absence of a clear showing, the exception must be overruled. The burden is on appellants to show…